AI for Financial Services: SOX, FFIEC, and GLBA Compliant

Automated control testing, regulatory change management, and audit preparation. Built for examiner scrutiny and financial services governance.

Book Assessment

Trusted by Enterprises Across Industries

Bayer
Takeda
Adidas
Rockwell Automation
Burckhardt Compression
Tillotts Pharma

Challenges

01

SOX control testing is manual and never-ending

Thousands of hours quarterly. Repetitive, rules-based work that consumes your most skilled compliance staff. One audit cycle ends as the next begins.

02

Regulatory change velocity accelerating

FFIEC, GLBA, BSA/AML, FINRA, and state regs change frequently. Your team finds out weeks or months late, usually from auditors instead of proactive monitoring.

03

Audit prep consumes months

Evidence collection and examiner preparation consume enormous resources annually. Staff spend weeks pulling evidence from dozens of systems instead of analyzing it.

04

Fraud detection gaps grow with volume

Traditional rules miss sophisticated patterns. Transaction volumes grow faster than your team can write rules, and the patterns that matter are increasingly complex.

Use Cases

Real-world applications

SOX Control Testing Automation

Continuous automated testing of internal controls with real-time deviation alerts and audit-ready evidence.

70% less manual testing

Regulatory Change Management

AI monitors FFIEC, SEC, FINRA, and state regulatory feeds to flag changes that affect your controls.

Same-day regulatory awareness

Audit Preparation Intelligence

Automated evidence collection and organization across systems, ready for examiner review.

60% faster audit prep

BSA/AML Transaction Monitoring

AI-enhanced monitoring of transaction patterns with reduced false positives and faster SAR filing.

Credit Risk Assessment

AI-powered analysis of loan portfolios with real-time risk scoring and concentration monitoring.

Regulatory Reporting Automation

Automated generation of call reports, HMDA data, and other regulatory filings with validation checks.

85% less reporting time

Results

Mid-Market Financial Institution · Financial Services

70%

Reduction in SOX control testing time with continuous automated monitoring replacing quarterly manual cycles.

We went from dreading audit season to having audit-ready evidence available on demand. The continuous monitoring changed everything.

Chief Compliance Officer

Read Full Case Study

Our Method

Production AI in 90 days

01

Assess

Weeks 1-2

Map workflows, data sources, and compliance requirements. Identify highest-impact use case.

02

Build

Weeks 3-8

Architecture, development, and integration with your systems. Security hardening from day one.

03

Pilot

Weeks 9-10

Deploy with pilot group. Measure against success metrics. Refine based on real usage.

04

Harden

Weeks 11-12

Production hardening, monitoring, documentation, and handoff with training and support.

Start with a $9,500 Assessment

Assessment fee credited toward implementation

Compliance & Security

SOXFFIECGLBAFINRAPCI DSSBSA/AMLBasel IIIState Banking Regs

Technology Partners

Azure AIAWS BedrockGoogle Vertex AIOpenAIOpen-Source LLMs

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

How do your AI systems meet SOX compliance requirements?

Our systems are built with SOX 404 compliance from the ground up — complete audit trails for every AI decision, segregation of duties controls, and evidence preservation. Every automated control test is logged and traceable for examiner review.

Can you integrate with our core banking system?

Yes. We integrate with FIS, Fiserv, Jack Henry, and other core banking platforms. The AI reads transaction data and system logs without modifying records of account.

How do you handle multi-state regulatory requirements?

We configure compliance monitoring for federal (FFIEC, OCC) and state-specific regulations simultaneously. The system maps overlapping requirements to avoid duplicate testing while ensuring full coverage.

What happens when the AI flags a potential compliance issue?

Flagged issues are routed to the appropriate compliance team with severity scoring, affected controls, and recommended remediation steps. Critical issues trigger immediate alerts, while lower-severity findings enter standard review workflows.

How quickly can we deploy compliance AI across our organization?

Initial deployment of continuous control monitoring follows our 90-day method. We start with your highest-risk frameworks (typically SOX and BSA/AML), then expand to additional regulatory domains in subsequent phases.

Ready to ship AI that actually works?

Start with a 15-minute call. No pitch decks. We'll discuss your use case and whether our 90-day method is the right fit.

Book AI Assessment