The challenge
The customer needed application-integrated identity flows and security operations capabilities, with an engineering team able to own the platforms after delivery.
Design identity around the application flows
The customer identity program used Azure AD B2C custom policies and Identity Experience Framework. The implementation covered authentication flows, claims transformation, and federation, together with application integration.
Custom policies defined the identity behavior needed by the applications. Claims transformation and federation formed part of the implementation rather than being left as separate downstream integration tasks.
Build the security operations workflows
A separate Microsoft Sentinel program established security operations capabilities with KQL analytics and detection rules. Automated response workflows used Logic Apps playbooks.
The engagement covered both the detection logic and the response workflow. Those were delivered as operational capabilities for the customer team, not simply a set of platform recommendations.
Keep delivery milestones specific
The Azure AD B2C program was delivered in five weeks. The Microsoft Sentinel program was delivered in four weeks. Each program had its own delivery scope.
The case describes the technologies used during the engagement. It does not imply that the same identity product or delivery duration is the default choice for every new implementation.
Give the engineering team ownership
After delivery, the customer engineering teams were trained to operate and extend both platforms independently. Enablement was part of the engagement, alongside the platform implementation.
That handover connected the initial delivery to ongoing ownership. The customer team could operate and extend the platforms independently after the initial delivery.
Key design decisions
Make identity behavior explicit in policy
Custom policies and Identity Experience Framework supported authentication flows, claims transformation, and federation. Application integration was part of that program.
Connect detection to a response workflow
The security operations program included KQL analytics and detection rules as well as Logic Apps playbooks. Its scope covered the operational response alongside the analytics.
Include enablement in delivery
Customer engineers were trained to operate and extend both platforms. The handover therefore covered ongoing ownership as well as the initial implementation.
How the workflow fits together
- 01
Identity track: apply the configured flow
Custom B2C policies handle the authentication and federation behavior required by the applications.
- 02
Identity track: transform and integrate claims
Claims transformation and application integration connect the identity flow to the business application.
- 03
Security track: evaluate the detection logic
Sentinel KQL analytics and detection rules provide the security operations logic.
- 04
Security track: run the defined response
Logic Apps playbooks support automated response workflows, with the customer team trained to operate and extend the program.
Questions for a similar implementation
Use these review points when you assess this architecture for your own environment.
- Do transformed claims preserve the identity information each application expects?
- Can the customer team explain how a detection relates to its response playbook?
- Can the owning engineers safely extend a policy or detection after handover?
The outcome
The customer received identity and security operations capabilities in separate five-week and four-week programs, with training to operate and extend both platforms independently.
- Azure AD B2C
- Identity Experience Framework
- Microsoft Sentinel
- KQL
- Azure Logic Apps
Client and delivery-partner names are withheld.